From the Toronto Sun
Donna Hayward is a heavy woman with a kind face, a vulnerable mother of two who fell easily for the smooth-talking Lothario who seemed to look past her weight and into her giving heart.
But now he has been accused of keeping the most heinous of secrets — not just from her, but from so many of his other lovers as well.
Lester Felix, the handsome 28-year-old she has been sleeping with for more than a year, has just been charged with aggravated assault for allegedly having unprotected sex without disclosing he has HIV — a medical condition he has had since 2005.
“Police believe there may be other victims,” their release said last week.
She is one of them.
IN SHOCK
Hayward sits in her cousin’s Scarborough apartment in a heavy haze of shock and cigarette smoke, her eyes swollen by a torrent of tears, paralyzed with fear as she waits to learn if she is now infected with HIV.
“I’m not that lucky to escape it, I know that,” says Hayward, 32. “If I have this, this a death sentence for me. I just keep thinking about my kids. Last night I cried myself to sleep. I’ll never see my kids finish school; I’ll never see my kids get married. Everybody says to stay positive, but it’s hard to.”
She initially met Felix online through a Facebook group called “BBWS (big boned women) worldwide and the black men who luv them” and began their relationship several days after meeting in person last August at one of the group’s social outings at a downtown club.
She weighed more than 300 pounds at the time — she’s lost about 50 since then — but for the first time, her size wasn’t a handicap.
“I felt that nobody would be interested in me and then there’s this good-looking guy asking me out; I thought he was someone who saw past the outside … ”
There will be many who will blame her for her misfortune, but no one does more than herself. Hayward wanted to use condoms, but says Felix told her he was allergic to latex and assured her he was “clean” — so she agreed to unprotected sex, a mistake she ‘ll always regret.
“You’ve got to be smart. If a guy won’t wear a condom, then don’t be with him because men will tell you anything to get what they want.”
They were together often, but Hayward was sometimes intimate with her children’s father and she was aware Felix was also sleeping with many other women he had met online. In fact, he once asked her to referee between two of his dates who had shown up at his Scarborough apartment at the same time.
She always came to his defence, she says, and even lavished him with presents. Hayward is on disability benefits because she suffers from depression, but after winning a few thousand dollars in a lottery, she gave him whatever he requested, from a cellphone to groceries.
He’s now accused of giving her the most horrible gift in return.
WARNING ISSUED
Hayward only learned of his arrest after her Facebook group issued a warning Friday urging anyone who had had sexual contact with Felix to contact police.
“I just burst into tears,” she recalls, “because he knew I had children, he met my children. I can’t believe somebody could be that cold-hearted.”
It has been almost 24 hours since then and the shock is slowly giving way to anger — anger that she might have unwittingly infected her “baby dad;” anger that her time with her two young daughters may have been cut short.
“What right did he have to play God with my life?”
This waiting for test results is torture and part of her yearns to hide until she learns her fate, but Hayward feels she has a duty to go public and encourage Felix’s other partners to get tested and speak to the police as she has.
“It’s embarrassing to come forward, to admit that I was with him, but hopefully me being strong enough to do this will help other people,” she says, her eyes filling with tears once again.
“I know there are other girls. I don’t want him to be able to do this ever again.”

1-Hot Story
A-Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Google+
Follow us on Twitter



3 users commented in " Toronto mother, Donna Hayward found out that boyfriend of one year, Lester Felix was HIV positive since 2005 "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThis is about Lester Felix and his appeal!!!
As well as all of his supporters
Appeals from two men convicted of sexual assault because they did not disclose their HIV-positive status before having sex were delayed by the Ontario Court of Appeal June 25.
At the centre of the cases is whether condom use negates the legal obligation to inform sexual partners of your HIV status before having sex.
The legal test for conviction — which requires proof of “a significant risk of serious bodily harm” — is under review by the Supreme Court of Canada. That court is expected to specifically address condom use and criminal prosecutions when it releases its decision in Mabior later this year.
The two Ontario Court of Appeal cases are unrelated, but because they raise the same legal issues, they are being heard together. The names of the accused are public, but Xtra has so far declined to publish them. The names of the complainants are protected by a publication ban.
F was convicted on a number of charges, including sexual assault for nondisclosure even though he used a condom.
M was convicted of aggravated sexual assault, and the trial judge ruled that condom use was irrelevant.
Sexual assault carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The maximum sentence for aggravated sexual assault is life in prison. If the convictions stand, their names could be added to the sex offender registry permanently. Neither of the defendants are currently in jail.
The Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and the HIV/AIDS Legal Clinic-Ontario intervened in the Ontario cases and presented a joint submission.
They argued that condom use reduces the risk of HIV transmission to 0.016 percent and therefore should be a complete bar to prosecution. They further argued that even when a condom is not used, in some cases the risk of transmission is too remote to constitute a “significant risk.”
The adjournment was a surprise to some HIV advocates. About 20 people packed into the court’s viewing gallery wearing T-shirts with the words “HIV positive” written on them, expecting to hear the arguments of the appeal. Instead, the judges acknowledged them, saying that the issue was important to many but announced their decision to hold off on the hearing until the Supreme Court’s decision in Mabior is released.
Tags: hiv/aids, mabior, supreme court of canada
Read More:
HIV criminalization is the biggest block to prevention
Supremely intimate
More Sharing ServicesShare | Share on email Share on facebook Share on reddit Share on twitter Share on stumbleupon Share on digg
Post a Comment
Reader Comments
These reader comments are posted directly. No editorial review is made prior to posting. Readers may contact the moderator with any complaints or concerns, and these will be reviewed within two business days.
Ah, the creation of undesirables…
(Nazi history anyone?)and if history is any indicator you can bet that those with HIV will be criminalized further. All thanks of course to “advocates” such as HALCO who god help us are interveners in the case. They among other “advocates” and “advocate” organizations dropped the ball in the first place by supporting the criminalization of HIV. The door is now WIDE-OPEN to perpetrate legal hate based discrimination, especially against Gay Men. Rather than being proactive and preemtive they chose an act of violence against the HIV community, just a little one, you know, supporting just a little HIV criminalization. An act so obscene a Board member resigned over the issue….. http://www.xtra.ca/public/Toronto/Time_to_stand_against_the_criminalization_of_HIV-7529.aspx…….Hmmn? I wonder how this is all going to go? Yep, we’ve seen this before. ALL HIV Positive people have very much to fear. I hope I’m wrong.
judgejudy, toronto on
06/26/12 12:32 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Don’t worry
Don’t worry judgejudy, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely accept the arguments of AIDS activists and rule that HIV-positive people have no legal duty to disclose their HIV status before having protected or unprotected sex. Instead, the law of the jungle will rule. If you’re HIV-negative and you choose to have bareback sex with strangers, don’t be surprised if one of them infects you. If you’re HIV-negative and you choose to have condom sex with strangers, don’t be surprised if one of them secretly takes the condom off during sex and infects you. That is the law of the jungle. That is the reality of sex with strangers in the gay male community. Happy Pride.
Tom, Toronto ON
06/26/12 12:56 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
meh
if a guy had something and they knew and didn’t tell me, they’d end up needing protective custody. Knowingly passing a disease should be treated as manslaughter. Potential partners have a right to know what dangers are involved.
Ralph, Mtl Qc
06/26/12 3:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hey Ralph….
I totally agree…as you say…”Knowingly passing a disease should be treated as manslaughter.”…ALL diseases not just those by the GAYS. ALL of them! You wanna give me the flu, FU! You wanna give me Hep FU!!!!!!!!!!!! These fuckers on the subway coughing and spewing their shit all over the place, giving me Pneumonia, Bronchitis who or who knows what? Round the fuckers up! This shit can kill me! HIV? I’m not worried about that, I’m worried about some imported infectious fucked-up disease I’m going to get from some fucker who failed to mention he may have TB or Cholera as he illegally entered the country while he gleefully rides the subway coughing and spewing everywhere he goes. HIV? That’s the LEAST of my concerns. I agree with you Ralph,…”Knowingly passing a disease should be treated as manslaughter.”
tim, toronto on
06/27/12 10:48 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
tim
All i know is every time i see a news report on some flu going around in asian countries, you see people on the metros wearing masks to protect strangers. What does it say about us that we don’t even care about our partners’ health, to the point of defending people’s right to get others sick without informed consent or judicial consequence.
Ralph, Mtl Qc
06/30/12 8:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ralph, nice try
it’s not about not giving informed consent, it’s about discrimination, and criminalization of mostly Gay Men. if it was about anything else, then those fuckers knowingly spreading diseases in public putting my health at risk would be rounded up and imprisoned. I can die from pneumonia, get it? No round of long-term meds will save me, unlike HIV which is mostly NOT a death sentence. But I can die from Pneumonia, almost have twice and each time it was given to me knowing walking around with pneumonia. And what about Hep C? That is a death sentence! Round them ALL up, why just pick on the Gays? And that’s what this is, oh sure we’ll cover the true intent by publicizing some black man screwing with white women to appease the innate hatred of the populace and their racism for justification of directed discrimination, but in the end, it’s GAY MEN.
tim, toronto on
06/30/12 12:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Discrimination…
If you knowingly give me Hep C, do you become a criminal? No? Why Not? It is a death sentence. …………………………………………………………………….. If you give me pneumonia, cholera, the plague, bacterial infections, the cold/flu while knowingly carrying this around, do you become a criminal? No? Why not? To me these things are death sentences and have been since I was a kid. …………………………………. Wear a fucking condom, accept personal responsibility for your own actions and stop trying to quarantine and criminalize the Gays. Or else make the law across the board. You can’t have it both ways. Only NAZI’S support this shit.
wizardofpoz, Hamilton ON
06/30/12 12:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
IT SHOULD BE KNOWN THAT LESTER FELIX WAS FOUND TO BE ********NOT GUILTY****** OF THIS SPECIFIC REPORT DUE TO EXPOSED FABRICATIONS DURING HIS TRIAL.
WHAT IS SAID IN THIS REPORT IS SLANDER THAT WAS PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW.
The Toronto Sun Should Remove this Page since it supports false claims.
Not Guilty?? I thought it was kinda fishy why she would go to the media right after he got arrested. Most wouldn’t want to talk to anyone ESPECIALLY the media.
I guess you would just hafe to imagine someone picking up the phone and saying ….
“Hey I slept with an hiv+ man and i didn’t know. Can you come to my house and interview me???”
ODD
Leave A Reply